REVISITING BAKER’S EQUIVALENCE FRAMEWORK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RECENT APPLICATIONS IN TRANSLATION STUDIES (2022–2025)

  • Baleid Taha Department of English, Faculty of Administrative and Human Sciences, University of Science and Technology, Aden,Yemen
DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21693667
Published: 2026-07-29
pdf
23
12

Abstract

Abstract

Mona Baker’s equivalence framework, presented in In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation, is widely used in translation studies to analyze meaning across several levels, including word-level, above-word, grammatical, textual, and pragmatic equivalence. Despite its influence, recent applications of the framework have not been systematically reviewed. Accordingly, this paper aims to identify recent research trends, methodological approaches, and gaps in studies applying Baker’s equivalence model between 2022 and 2025. To achieve this objective, a systematic literature review was conducted using Google Scholar and the Directory of Open Access Journals. Following a multi-stage screening process, including duplicate removal and full-text evaluation, 20 peer-reviewed articles were selected and analyzed through qualitative synthesis. The findings reveal that most studies focus on above-word equivalence, particularly idiomatic expressions, followed by word-level equivalence. In contrast, few studies adopt a multi-level analytical approach. Moreover, the reviewed literature shows minimal attention to grammatical, textual, and pragmatic equivalence, indicating an imbalance in the contemporary application of Baker’s framework. Overall, Baker’s framework continues to demonstrate strong analytical relevance in contemporary translation research, although its higher-level dimensions remain underexplored.

Keywords: Baker’s model Academic burnout translation equivalence framework non-equivalence

How to Cite

Taha, B. (2026). REVISITING BAKER’S EQUIVALENCE FRAMEWORK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RECENT APPLICATIONS IN TRANSLATION STUDIES (2022–2025). European Journal of Humanistic Studies and Social Dynamics, 2(3), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21693667
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Issue

Volume 2, No. 3, 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 European Journal of Humanistic Studies and Social Dynamics

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

1.
1. Nida E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translating: With special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. Brill Archive.
2.
2. Catford J. C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation: An essay in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
3.
3. Baker M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). Routledge. (Original work published 1992).
4.
4. Reiss K., & Vermeer, H. J. (2014). Towards a general theory of translational action: Skopos theory explained (C. Nord, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1984).
5.
5. Toury G. (1995). Descriptive translation studies and beyond. John Benjamins.
6.
6. Venuti L. (1995). The translator's invisibility: A history of translation. Routledge.
7.
7. Mansoor K. (2018). Translation across the difficulties of equivalence concept. Buletinul Stiintific al Universitatii Politehnica din Timisoara, Seria Limbi Moderne, (17), 55–66.
8.
8. Pym A. (2010). Exploring translation theories. Routledge.
9.
9. Amin F. M. (2020). Students problem in translating pragmatic equivalency. JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 1(1), 50–71.
10.
10. Fetaih D. M. (2024). Equivalence and non-equivalence in the intrasemiotic translation of English-Arabic pictograms: Towards a comprehensive model of multi-channel translation. Majallat Al-Baḥth Al-ʿIlmī fī Al-Ādāb, 25(7), 141–164.
11.
11. Panchenko, O. (2025). The notion of equivalence in its historic development and contemporary understanding. Journal “Ukrainian sense”, (1), 136–145.
12.
12. Oneț A. E., & Ciocoi-Pop, A. B. (2023). Equivalence in translation: Translation studies as an interdiscipline. Revista Academiei Fortelor Terestre, 28(1), 39–44.
13.
13. Marhamah M., Hidayati, D., & Prasatyo, B. A. (2024). Equivalence challenges in machine translation: An analysis of Google Translate output through Mona Baker's theory and post-editing strategies. International Journal of Economics, Management, Business and Social Science, 4(1), 78–89.
14.
14. Kamphuis A. (2019). The concept of equivalence in functional approaches to translation: A complexity-theoretical evaluation. Dissertation (PH.D.), University of the Free State.
15.
15. Faraj B. R. A. (2024). Mona Baker's strategies used for translating the Arabic hand idioms. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(1), 139–145.
16.
16. Syamsul D., Amalia, F., & Sopiawati, I. (2025). Analysis of meaning equivalence between dubbing and subtitles in “Lost Bullet” movie. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya, 19(3), 228–237.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.